4 ms·
Not that I don't ♥ The Gruber™, but the link should probably be pointing at the original article, as all John is doing here is quoting from the Wired piece.
by alanstorm 16y ago
Not that I don't ♥ The Gruber™, but the link should probably be pointing at the original article, as all John is doing here is quoting from the Wired piece.
- hokkos 16y agoThe original article is not accessible.
- alanstorm 16y agoWeird, it comes up fine for me http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/07/ff_att_fail/all/1 http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/07/ff_att_fail/all/1 stupidbrokeninternet
- joubert 16y agoI think he typed google into google (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1531590 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1531590)
- jesseendahl 16y agoI made an HN submission to the original article 2 hours before this link to Gruber showed up here. The original article was on the front page of HN (and still is: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1529931 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1529931), but for some reason this submission has twice the points. Guesses: * Catchier headline. * Short attention spans mean excerpts are more highly valued on HN (despite lack of context, such as bugs in the original baseband, as pointed out by cligner below).
- jasonlotito 16y agoSeveral reasons for this. 1. DF sneezes and get's hits. 2. Linkbait headline. 3. Shorter post means people are back here faster and will remember to upvote. Wired article is longer, much better, and by the time you are done, you forget to upvote.