5 ms·
Which has constantly made me wonder why we haven't experimented with it as a means of cooling the average global temperature.
by archontes 9y ago
Which has constantly made me wonder why we haven't experimented with it as a means of cooling the average global temperature.
- partialapply 9y agoBecause it doesn't cool the global temperatures by virtue of being itself. Nuclear winter is caused when massive amounts of debris and other particles (like smoke) are shot up into the air, blocking some of the sunlight, resulting in cooler temperatures. This also has the affect of less crop yields due to reductions in sunlight, less electricity generated from solar panels, and other consequences. So unless we want to voluntarily eat significantly less and use less energy in the name of cooling Earth's temp for 5 years, it's not a very viable alternative. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_winter#Mechanism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_winter#Mechanism
- eric_h 9y agoWe need a staging/QA Earth so we can run these kinds of experiments.
- subcosmos 9y agoSelenium isn't the best fissile material :p
- jandrese 9y agoFilling the sky with radioactive particles to combat global warming is an end I hope we never reach.
- ethbro 9y agoAssuming low-radiation devices can be used, if things get dire then it certainly beats the alternatives.