4 ms·
If only. That's lying for financial gain though (or a job or whatever). Burden is on the consumer - you - to get Equifax to correct it. Credibility may destroy
by scrumper 9y ago
If only. That's lying for financial gain though (or a job or whatever). Burden is on the consumer - you - to get Equifax to correct it. Credibility may destroy their business if competitors are better, but in the meantime you can't refute by default on a presumption of inaccuracy.( Not trying to sound lawyerish here, I'm talking generally.)
- mikk14 9y agoBut I am not the consumer of Equifax. I have not paid them, nor asked them to do anything, nor indirectly getting a service from them [0]. The consumer is the bank or whoever paid for the information. So, on your logic being "the burden is on the consumer", why should the burden be on me? Second, why would the presumption of inaccuracy trump the presumption of accuracy? Who said Equifax is right? Especially since they have a track record of incompetence. As any debate on facts goes, the burden of the proof is on whomever is making a claim. Equifax is claiming something, i.e. that my credit score is X. I'm saying it is not. I concede you that what you say is probably how the law and the system works right now. And I concede that mine was more like a desire than a real prediction. I know things won't change. But that doesn't change the fact that, after the hack, Equifax and similar are just selling hot air. [0] If you want my credit score, you ask me for my statements, nor Equifax. If anything, Equifax is damaging me with their inaccurate information.