3 ms·
> I am confident that Apple is not collecting a photo database, but not optimistic that it can't be hacked with fake faces. I dislike the fact that the police c
by newscracker 9y ago
> I am confident that Apple is not collecting a photo database, but not optimistic that it can't be hacked with fake faces. I dislike the fact that the police can point the phone at someone and have it automatically unlock.
That's what I thought too when the Face ID feature was confirmed (post rumors). It's easier for other people to take one's phone (talking about known people here), point it at the face and unlock it without the owner's consent or interaction. This is not that trivial to do with Touch ID, where one would have to grab the owner's hand and place the finger (or fingers) on the Home button. The odds of being deceived into unlocking one's phone without knowledge or consent seems to be higher here.
From a privacy perspective, I also worry about how governments would use these advances in technology for surveillance (if we believe Apple's claim of fingerprints having an error rate of 1 in 50000 and face recognition having an error rate of 1 in a million).
- valuearb 9y agoUnlocking requires attention. They'd have to take your phone, point it at your face, and stop you from closing your eyes or looking elsewhere. If they can do all that, how can TouchID or a passcode stop them?
- newscracker 9y agoI mentioned in my comment, within parentheses, that I was referring to known people - like friends, acquaintances, classmates, co-workers, etc. It's easier to unlock the phone and get sensitive information with Face ID than with Touch ID. I can only think of pranks going severely wrong and causing havoc. We'll get to know in a few months.