4 ms·
> or very few and only for highly talented people How many people and jobs are we talking about, if these are the jobs expected to support the vast majority of
by xienze 9y ago
> or very few and only for highly talented people
How many people and jobs are we talking about, if these are the jobs expected to support the vast majority of the populace? And on a related note, why would these people not feel resentful that (by necessity) a major chunk of their earnings is directed towards everyone else?
Assuming that humans will behave differently and be driven by different things than they have _for millenia_ is foolish, and why BI will never work.
- ThomPete 9y agoHumans are part of a larger system, that system is evolution. For millions of years evolution have favored those who adapt to a new environment. Thats the proper perspective to understand this discussion, not pointing back to a few thousand years of human civilization, unless of course you claim that humans is the last word in evolutionary process. If you (like me) believe technology will take over most jobs then (U)BI is so far the best model we have as it will always make it worthwhile to work.