4 ms·
this might be true, but i don't see why it should be. if two pieces collide at a high speed and shatter explosively, why would they stay confined to a single pl
by stefs 9y ago
this might be true, but i don't see why it should be. if two pieces collide at a high speed and shatter explosively, why would they stay confined to a single plane?
- mikeash 9y agoI think the plane change would be small, since the velocity change experienced by the fragments would be small compared to the orbital speed. For empirical support of this idea, consider Saturn.
- Retric 9y agoRing formation has an intermediate dust phase. http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/about-us/66-our-solar-system/planets-and-dwarf-planets/saturn/276-why-are-saturn-s-rings-flat-intermediate http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/about-us/66-our-solar-syste... Another consideration the moon does not orbit the earths equator but Uranus, Saturn, and Jupiter's rings do. This suggest tidal forces play a major role and you would not end up with a ring in the same inclination as the Moon's orbit.
- PeterisP 9y agoThe plane change would be just as small or large as the change in orbit, the directions are the same. If a collision is not likely to produce significant plane change, it's also not likely to produce fragments that go to significantly lower orbit to hit Earth; and if a collision is sending some fragments towards earth, then it's sending as many fragments significantly sideways to a different orbit inclination.
- pavel_lishin 9y agoTo quote another Stephenson novel, "plane changes are expensive."
- stefs 9y agothey are - an explosive collision provides a lot of financing though.