3 ms·
Comparing the level of care between Medicaid and the basic Sécurité Sociale benefits leads me to question this assertion. Same for public transit, the lack the
by athenot 9y ago
Comparing the level of care between Medicaid and the basic Sécurité Sociale benefits leads me to question this assertion.
Same for public transit, the lack thereof in most of America severly handicaps the poor who do not have a car.
Education too: the poor have the opportunity to put their kids through college or even med school. Yes there are higher failure rates among the poor, but 75% of the poor still graduate HS and if they make it past that, they've cleared the hardest hurdle (fewer dropouts among poor in college than MS/HS). http://www.education.gouv.fr/cid5008/les-trajectoires-scolaires-des-enfants-pauvres.html http://www.education.gouv.fr/cid5008/les-trajectoires-scolai...
- dmix 9y agoThis is pretty much the type of analysis I was critiquing. You simply can't measure the quality of life of poor simply via a few highly visible public institutions... or something like GDP per capita. This is isn't about who has better public institutions (which plays a part) but the fact economics and quality of life are complex, deep subjects, and debates about who 'takes care of their poor' are so often reductive and narrowly focused.