3 ms·
Well no, because under jedbrown's scheme the insurance is there to pay the claim. Simple analogy: a homeowner still has to make a claim if their locked, alarme
by scrumper 9y ago
Well no, because under jedbrown's scheme the insurance is there to pay the claim.
Simple analogy: a homeowner still has to make a claim if their locked, alarmed house is ransacked while they're away. Insurance may subsequently deny the claim if it's shown that the homeowner failed to follow best practices, such as locking doors and windows. In other words, adherence to best practices is a condition of insurance.
- criddell 9y agoOk, I see it now and I agree. I think negligence or fraud on the part of the company should multiply the penalty and it probably release the insurer from being responsible.