> Racket is interesting, but what turns me off about the language is that they decided they needed OO for some things and they... implemented a single dispatch

> Racket is interesting, but what turns me off about the language is that they decided they needed OO for some things and they... implemented a single dispatch based system. yeah, frustratingly they have a great core language and then tack on optional OO, generics or static typing systems that are about 80%-90% baked. then those systems see just enough use they can't be ignored, but not so much that someone steps up to finish the last bit of baking.