3 ms·
Performance is definitely worse than in iTerm or gnome-terminal, but it's improved a lot in recent Upterm versions, and we plan to improve it further. I'd say i
by shockone 9y ago
Performance is definitely worse than in iTerm or gnome-terminal, but it's improved a lot in recent Upterm versions, and we plan to improve it further. I'd say it's good enough, but you can try yourself.
Recently there was this terminal performance test https://danluu.com/term-latency/ https://danluu.com/term-latency/
The author says that the most important things are typing delay and how quickly you can Ctrl+C a command, not how much text it prints per second. Upterm is good at both.
- creshal 9y ago> Performance is definitely worse than in iTerm or gnome-terminal I dropped those because they're magnitudes slower than urxvt. You managed to make a terminal emulator that's even worse?
- phren0logy 9y agoHey, I bet nobody will force you to use it or help develop it. Not every tool fits everyone’s needs. Some tools might only be useful to a few people. No need to be rude about it.
- Diti 9y agoI don’t mean to spark a controversy, but that’s what happens when you use Electron.
- trapperkeeper74 9y agoLOL. I dropped Atom back to Vim the same reason.. electron apps are just too slow and memory-hogging compared to native apps.
- etatoby 9y ago> Performance is definitely worse than in iTerm or gnome-terminal Considering I dropped those because I consider them slow and bloated, good luck with this Electron monstrosity. You can have my RXVT when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.