3 ms·
The point of the donation was a bet, to receive government favoritism in the event of election. Is that non-obvious?
by zorpner 9y ago
The point of the donation was a bet, to receive government favoritism in the event of election. Is that non-obvious?
- jjeaff 9y agoWhich is why basically every big corporation and donor donates to both side of the campaign. This is nothing new. Only difference is that here, Thiel donated to a candidate that didn't get many other big donations because it was presumed he had no chance of winning.
- dogruck 9y ago"Government favoritism" is markedly different from the actual "leadership role in the newly elected government"