3 ms·
it can't even demonstrate that we're not already there. This is simply false. That's the whole point of the test.
by sillysaurus3 9y ago
it can't even demonstrate that we're not already there.
This is simply false. That's the whole point of the test.
- dahart 9y agoI realize it's the intended point of your test, that doesn't mean it will work. Your test cannot do what you claim just because you want it to. Read the article about argument from ignorance. For your test to work, you'd have to guarantee it had the best CG that's possible. You can't guarantee that. You can never prove we're not already there because no matter what CG you make for the test, someone else can always try harder, take more time, use better artists and bigger computers, spend more money. Abscence of evidence is not evidence of abscence. Your logic is faulty, your argument is suffering from a fallacy. You can speculate that your idea of realism isn't possible yet, but no test can prove it.