4 ms·
Everything that is old is new again. AT&T used to claim anyone who attached an unapproved telephone was a criminal: http://bpastudio.csudh.edu/fac/lpress/471/h
by sounds 9y ago
Everything that is old is new again.
AT&T used to claim anyone who attached an unapproved telephone was a criminal: http://bpastudio.csudh.edu/fac/lpress/471/hout/telecomHistory/ http://bpastudio.csudh.edu/fac/lpress/471/hout/telecomHistor...
"Freed" slaves in the US used to only get to rent land on which to live: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharecropping#United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharecropping#United_States
Being in control of your own destiny isn't actually that common, historically.
- phkahler 9y agoWe all rent the land on which we live. Try not paying your property taxes. In most states.
- nine_k 9y agoBut you can also can rent land on which to farm, to build a factory, or a skyscraper, without living on that land.
- narrator 9y ago...except for Nevada when for a few years they briefly allowed people to get allodial title.
- ekianjo 9y agothats almost a worldwide exception
- rxhernandez 9y agoI hear Mexico allows you to actually own land.
- ZenoArrow 9y agoI don't know if this counts or not, but in the UK there are the concepts of freehold and leasehold. Leasehold requires payment of rent on land (to a landlord), but freehold does not. I believe that technically all land is owned by the crown, but I don't think they tax based on land ownership.
- somebodynew 9y ago...that expired upon death and could not be passed to heirs.
- fujiters 9y agoStill pretty cool.
- squarefoot 9y agoto me this looks fair: land does not reproduce, but people do. Give people the right to own a non infinite resource forever and pretty soon you get to the point where 1% of them will own 99% of that resource, which is exactly what is happening now in many contexts.
- __david__ 9y agoIn CA they just put a lien on your house. And all that means is you can't sell without clearing the lien (by paying back). I didn't pay property taxes for 2 years once.
- ensignavenger 9y agoThat will happen in most states, but if you don't pay long enough they will usually come after you. It may take several years.
- int_19h 9y agoWith land, it at least makes sense, because there's a very limited supply of it. So one could reasonably argue that it's just too valuable for society to fully surrender all control of even a part of it on a permanent basis.
- ensignavenger 9y agoI read the linked wikipedia article, but there was nothing in it that I found to support your assertion the freed slaves were not allowed to own land?