7 ms·
> The taste is similar to a well-done beef patty Isn't this basically the goal?
by dylz 9y ago
> The taste is similar to a well-done beef patty
Isn't this basically the goal?
- throwaway613834 9y agoI think he didn't want it well done.
- nsxwolf 9y agoAre you interpreting "well-done" to mean tasty, high quality, etc? It means overcooked to the point the meat is completely gray. Highly undesirable to many (though preferred by some).
- hsod 9y agoOP said they ordered it well done (because there were no other options). So if it tasted like a well-done beef patty then I'd call that a success. If the OP didn't like it because they don't like well done burgers in general then, well, I'm not sure what they were expecting when they ordered one.
- chc 9y agoThey said they didn't have any choice in how it was prepared, and the restaurant picked "well-done" — but yes, I would call that a success for Impossible. Just because Umami Burger prepares the burger poorly doesn't mean the burger failed, since it tastes as good as a normal meat burger would be expected to when prepared the same way.
- teh_klev 9y ago> If the OP didn't like it because they don't like well done burgers in general then, well, I'm not sure what they were expecting when they ordered one. What OP actually said: "It's cooked well-done and can't be ordered any other way." OP didn't order it that way, Umami Burger won't cook it any other way.
- anotheryou 9y agoI'd guess they aim at the low-price market eventually. If they can scale it well enough it might become cheaper then real meat for mc donalds and than at will be huge!
- Domenic_S 9y agoGround beef should be cooked until there's no pink. https://www.foodsafety.gov/keep/charts/mintemp.html https://www.foodsafety.gov/keep/charts/mintemp.html
- nsxwolf 9y agoAnd then promptly thrown in the garbage.
- Domenic_S 9y agoIf you've got an argument, make it. Pink ground beef isn't safe. https://www.foodsafety.gov/keep/charts/mintemp.html https://www.foodsafety.gov/keep/charts/mintemp.html
- gowld 9y agoFood that is edible but unsafe vs food that is inedible but safe.
- nsxwolf 9y agoIn my case it's been safe enough to eat for 40 years without incident. Not even pink, but bloody dripping red.
- greedo 9y agoIt's not the color, it's the internal temperature. Not necessarily correlated...
- batbomb 9y agoit's temperature * time, actually.
- cr0sh 9y agoDo you like your pork cooked until grey? I've seen it. Properly cooked pork (not ground pork!) should actually be slightly pink in the middle (like with a pork chop). Anything more is overcooked. /most people have no clue how to cook pork...
- nilkn 9y agoJust to be clear, it's far less safe to eat ground beef rare than a steak. With a steak, potentially harmful bacteria are all on the outside, which you sear. So the interior can be practically raw and the steak will be safe to consume. If you grind it up, the outside is now mixed into the inside. One cool trick to get around this is to cook the beef sous vide. Beef can be pasteurized at as low as 130 F as long as it's held at that temperature for long enough. That's basically medium rare.
- ouid 9y agoless safe, but not far less safe. since 1998, there have been less than 400 deaths from foodborne illness in the united states. 12 of those were from ground beef. Your risk is utterly negligible.
- OJFord 9y agoYou might still be right, but safety for many isn't about merely not dying.
- ouid 9y agoAlright, there are ~5000 cases of foodborne illness since 1998 in this report, ~600 resulting in hospitalizations. ~1 in a million over 20 years
- awinder 9y ago“CDC estimates 48 million people get sick, 128,000 are hospitalized, and 3,000 die from foodborne diseases each year in the United States”
- ouid 9y agoI was only talking about ground beef, but perhaps I am using this tool incorrectly? https://wwwn.cdc.gov/foodborneoutbreaks/ https://wwwn.cdc.gov/foodborneoutbreaks/