2 ms·

Was the reduction to the extreme really necessary? But okay, in that particular case, we have the ToS and laws regarding threatening behavior to fall back on. (

• pjc50 9y ago
  > Was the reduction to the extreme really necessary? Well, we started with discussion of genocide at the top of the thread, so it's kind of in context. > giving the subject of a conversation an unconditional veto on the conversation. Isn't this the other extreme?
  • Karunamon 9y ago
    I may have misinterpreted your original comment. You said: Also, in some cases other people see the trolling about you even after you block it. ..which implies it's a negative that you don't have control over the (valueJudgmentOf: comments) about you after you've blocked the conversation. Was this incorrect?
    • pjc50 9y ago
      Yes, but that's not the same as unconditional veto. This is basically the situation where you'd want to appeal to a third party human.
      • Karunamon 9y ago
        That's basically what we have now but with an extra step added.