3 ms·
Two questions and one observation: (1) Why is it the government's job to motivate people? Shouldn't people be motivated by their own self-interest? (2) The ri
by malandrew 9y ago
Two questions and one observation:
(1) Why is it the government's job to motivate people? Shouldn't people be motivated by their own self-interest?
(2) The rise of bigger government and a welfare state might even be contributing to the problem, but debasing the impetus to train. Some carefully considered welfare can provide relief to an acute problem, but long term welfare is counterproductive.
- TheAdamAndChe 9y agoIf it's the company that benefits from the training, shouldn't it be the company's job to train people? Why should our government and workers subsidize company training with student loans?
- malandrew 9y agoYour tone suggests you're arguing against me, but we're both in agreement that this isn't the responsibility of government.
- TheAdamAndChe 9y agoMy tone was a partial response to the phrase below, and a partial catchy soundbite to agree with your point that the government shouldn't step in. > Shouldn't people be motivated by their own self-interest? It should also be in the company's self-interest to train its workers, it's just because of a bad worker-employer leverage balance that they don't take advantage of that.
- Clubber 9y agoThey're all run by spreadsheets more so than intuition. Training is difficult to quantify. How to you quantify into dollars the difference between time, cost and results of training versus time, cost and result of putting out headhunters to fill the position with someone already trained? I mean most companies can't even interview well and it's a lot easier to just do it the old way that they've been doing it forever rather than stick your neck out and try something new and barely quantifiable if at all. Especially when HR has the final say.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]