4 ms·
I was in Iraq in 1991. My friends and I were astounded when we heard of the cease-fire; we could easily push towards Baghdad and take care of Saddam Hussein, w
by MrZongle2 9y ago
I was in Iraq in 1991. My friends and I were astounded when we heard of the cease-fire; we could easily push towards Baghdad and take care of Saddam Hussein, who was clearly the Hitler of our time. "We'll be back in a decade" I thought, as it seemed as if we were leaving with our work unfinished.
I was off by a couple of years, but in 2003 when we went back into Iraq to finally take care of Hussein, I was pleased. Of course, I had long since left the Army and now it was some other bunch of soldiers sitting in a tent. When they pulled Hussein out of his spider hole, I was thrilled. Justice, right?
But Iraq didn't turn into a shining example of emerging democracy; it was a shit-show of tribal feuds, incompetence, waste, fraud and abuse that continued to kill decent American kids. The contemporary Iraqi WMDs -- the reason for our costly endeavor -- never really materialized (though their historical presence and usage against Kurds and Iranians was often downplayed). It became increasingly clear that all our involvement contributed to was a power vacuum in which something nastier could breed.
Afghanistan, a seemingly more focused war due to the Taliban's sheltering and support of al Qaeda in the wake of 9/11, at this point appears to be no more productive. Different tribes, different waste, fraud and abuse, different American kids killed so career politicians can check a box on their list of accomplishments.
While I still respect men & women who join the military, my disdain for the "warrior worship" culture that has become the norm has grown. When I returned from the Gulf in 1991, I was amazed by such goodwill and support for the military; it was, I believe, a collective reaction to the infamous reception Vietnam-era soldiers received upon coming home. I would not want to deprive returning troops of the same feel-good experience, but at the same time I've grown weary of almost seventeen years of "thank you for our service" and the obligatory shots of troops abroad watching the sportsball game du jour, the abuse of the term "hero", and this somehow normalized condition of young men and women being sent to shithole third-world countries "to keep America safe".
We're in the second decade of this madness, with no clear goals for victory or even to declare a statemate. As much as I love my country, at this point were there even a hint of a draft I would be the first to drive my teenage boys to the Canadian border -- a concept that would have astounded and enraged a younger me.
Amidst the author's pious wailing and gnashing of teeth, the question "where are today’s skeptical veterans?" is posed.
Well, here's one. And I'm far from alone. Most of us, I suspect, aren't vocal because of one simple reason: it will accomplish nothing.
As with other causes, such as the environment, drug legalization, investment in national infrastructure, additional funding for scientific research, our political class turns a deaf ear to the populace. We the little people have our designated role: fly the flag of Team Pepsi or Team Coke, pay our taxes, and become enraged at each other while the aristocracy does what they will.
We are largely jaded, and having assessed the impossibility of stopping the tide many of us merely do what we can to stay on higher ground and be cognizant of storm surges.
- smcl 9y ago> that continued to kill decent American kids. and decent Iraqis of all ages
- MrZongle2 9y agoIn the years since, I've sometimes thought about my counterparts in the Iraqi army during the Gulf War: the ones on the "Highway of Death", and the ones simply bombed to smithereens in the middle of nowhere. Their leadership probably deserved that fate, though few of the rank-and-file. I wonder what Iraq would be like today if we had done in 1991 what we postponed to 2003. I wonder how many of those Iraqis killed since the Gulf War would have been able to make their country a far better place than it is today. Ultimately, the whole thing has been a massive failure; it would have been better for us, and likely much of the Middle East, to have let Iraq take Kuwait (and Saudi Arabia, for that matter). It wasn't our fight. It was never our fight.
- bryananderson 9y agoI agree with most of what you're saying, but I'm not buying that these things (peace, environmental action, science investment, etc) aren't happening because the masses are being stymied by the powers that be. On the contrary, I don't see the masses caring about these things at all. Do you? I don't see the majority of the people demanding action against (or even acknowledging the existence of) climate change. Nor do I see them demanding action against endless war or illegal surveillance. Nor do I see them begging for more money to be invested in science. Instead I see the people sometimes arguing about a few hot-button political issues, but mostly I see the people preoccupied with pop culture and their daily lives. We, the People, have made it abundantly clear that we are fine with the status quo. No one had to coerce us. Remember, the Iraq War was not started over the outcry of the American people. It was started to thunderous applause.
- Clubber 9y ago>We, the People, have made it abundantly clear that we are fine with the status quo. Whether you lean D or R or neither, do you really believe Trump was a vote for the status quo? The Ds got shut out and the Rs are breaking apart and can't even work as a party. Things are changing, I just don't know if it's for the better.