3 ms·
I think of "Centrists" the non-negotiable principle is cooperation and successful operation of government for the dignity of the most people, and other policy p
by pchristensen 9y ago
I think of "Centrists" the non-negotiable principle is cooperation and successful operation of government for the dignity of the most people, and other policy principles have to compete within that framework. As opposed to the Republican and Democratic parties, which have identified no-compromise principles that divide people as effectively as sporting alliances or religions.
Example (of my own, not from any Centrist literature): charging a commensurate fee to pollute a river rather than strictly allowing or outlawing it. The business would prefer to be allowed to pollute for free (Republican Party principle) while the environmentalists would prefer that the pollution not be emitted under any circumstances (Democratic Party principle). But a structure that accurately prices the impacts and externalities of the pollution respects the environmental and health values, and the business can choose the most beneficial option for them: prevention, change of product or process, or just paying the fee.
- gpvos 9y agoBut it adds bureaucracy, instead of either nothing or some policemen.
- bradknowles 9y agoThere is a cost, regardless. If you do nothing and allow anyone to pollute anywhere they want, then you get a public health crisis and many people die and many more get sick. If you prohibit the pollution and heavily police the people who try to pollute anyway, then you have to pay for all the efforts to enforce the prohibition plus you have the possibility of job loss as those companies go somewhere else that does allow them to pollute freely. If you allow the pollution but charge a cleanup fee, then you have the increased beauracracy, etc.... There Is No Such Thing As A Free Lunch.
- woah 9y agoCan you pay a fee for murder?