> The winning strategy is to use a library/framework/whatever for embedding user-provided content into HTML. I think I agree. Shell is very convenient, but it

> The winning strategy is to use a library/framework/whatever for embedding user-provided content into HTML. I think I agree. Shell is very convenient, but it's just too easy to make mistakes. I think something like eshell[0] or a shell based on sweet expressions[1] could go a long way towards providing a powerful shell in a real programming language — with safety against foot-guns like one finds in bash & zsh (the latter is still my default shell, despite its problems). [0] https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_mono/eshell.html https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_mono/eshell.h... [1] http://readable.sourceforge.net/ http://readable.sourceforge.net/