4 ms·
>this is a ratio of 2000:1. In which case he would actually have been generous to DuckDuckGo while not being wrong by orders of magnitude. Conclusion: OP mean
by sandov 9y ago
>this is a ratio of 2000:1.
In which case he would actually have been generous to DuckDuckGo while not being wrong by orders of magnitude.
Conclusion: OP meant linear size, not mass. He could have stated it explicitly though, because one would naturally think that he was referring to mass.
- viridian 9y agoThis actually isn't true. Based on the numbers we have, and have been posted in this thread this is unfair to DDG by a factor of almost 2.