> That's not dismissive -- no one has ever made any program that outputs a string of images indistinguishable from a real camcorder. It's just that hard. > Not

> That's not dismissive -- no one has ever made any program that outputs a string of images indistinguishable from a real camcorder. It's just that hard. > Note the important distinction: no one, anywhere, has ever created a real-time video simulation indistinguishable from the output of a real camcorder You redefined what you're talking about: clarifying that it has to be real-time. What if someone generated 2 images within 1/24th of a second? Would that would count as a 33.367ms long video? To learn more about how the eye interprets the structure of light, I recommend skimming Minnaert's Light and Color in the Outdoors (won't cover motion).