2 ms·
> exact same end result Not really, but "exact same end result" is far from the current situation. And I'm not saying they shouldn't do it, rather that they re
by kowdermeister 9y ago
> exact same end result
Not really, but "exact same end result" is far from the current situation. And I'm not saying they shouldn't do it, rather that they really need to catch up.
Google (not counting other Alphabet companies) does a lots of things. I think the original analogy is mostly right.
- StavrosK 9y ago> "exact same end result" is far from the current situation My point can be rephrased as "given that the result is the same, do employee counts matter"? If not, then they don't matter in general.