> What would you consider a modern feature? For starters: one that was thought up (or at least added to the language, if we're being that context-sensitive) mo

> What would you consider a modern feature? For starters: one that was thought up (or at least added to the language, if we're being that context-sensitive) more recently than 30 years ago. > No language can be considered modern by this definition, rendering it fairly useless as a definition. I agree that it's a fairly useless descriptor.