3 ms·
Too bad there's no MacRuby, which is probably the fastest ruby interpreter (though it only runs on OS X).
by necubi 16y ago
Too bad there's no MacRuby, which is probably the fastest ruby interpreter (though it only runs on OS X).
- acangiano 16y agoIt's right there in the first paragraph of the article: http://programmingzen.com/2010/05/16/benchmarking-macruby-0-6/ http://programmingzen.com/2010/05/16/benchmarking-macruby-0-...
- aarongough 16y agoAnd it looks like it's slower that either 1.8 or 1.9...
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]