> If I remember correctly, clos had a strange naming connection that included the type in the symbol name CLOS is built around multiple dispatch, so there isn'

> If I remember correctly, clos had a strange naming connection that included the type in the symbol name CLOS is built around multiple dispatch, so there isn't any type to go in the method name if you wanted; methods don't belong to a class, they just specialise generic functions onto any number of their arguments. What lispm described goes quite a ways beyond apropos, though.