>a point of view to lead readers to be left wing economists. Oh come on, that's ridiculous. If you think Keynesianism is "left wing economics", you've got anot

>a point of view to lead readers to be left wing economists. Oh come on, that's ridiculous. If you think Keynesianism is "left wing economics", you've got another thing coming: Marxian economics has been excluded from the discourse such that almost every university will describe its department as neoclassical or Keynesian. And this book isn't even a Marxist one. It contains no seething critiques of the capitalist mode of production. The beginning to left wing economics is Marx, even if you don't accept his theory of value. This text is not such a beginning. If you want an opinionated guide to capitalism, read Capital Vol. I by Karl Marx (1867)[0]. [0] https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/