3 ms·
I think you are making evolution sound less scientific than it is. One thing that is a certifiable fact is that species are not fixed. As shown by the fossil r
by ufo 9y ago
I think you are making evolution sound less scientific than it is.
One thing that is a certifiable fact is that species are not fixed. As shown by the fossil record, new species can show up and old species go extinct. And in a smaller time scale, the artificial selection that happens with domesticated plants and animals shows that there can be significant changes in species.
Once we realize that some sort of evolution must be happening the question becomes to explain what mechanism is behind it. One of the initial hypothesis was the Lamarckian theory that animals can pass on to their offspring traits that they acquired via their lifestyle. This was eventually proven false when we found no evidence that this is not how genetics actually works. Darwin's theory of natural selection is still with us because it withstood the test of time, not because it is unfalsifiable.
This is very clear if you read Darwin's books. He was aware that there are many
things that would contradict his theory if they were true and he spends lots of chapters refuting them.
A more modern source I like to point to is Talkorigin's list of 29 evidences for macroevolution. It covers many of the things known to Darwin and more recent developments such as genetics, molecular biology and new fossil finds. http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/ http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/
- banku_brougham 9y agoThank you. Obscure notation does not grant value to a concept. They are different achievements, one of precision and general findings about the inert material universe, the other an idea the describes the conflagration of life itself.
- busyant 9y ago> Lamarckian theory that animals can pass on to their offspring traits that they acquired via their lifestyle. This was eventually proven false when we found no evidence that this is not how genetics actually works. Lamarckian theory might not be _completely_ false. There is definitely epigenetic inheritance, in which traits (reflecting the state of a parent) can be passed on without being explicitly encoded by nucleic acid. Whether epigenetic inheritance is a stable-multi-generational way of transferring traits is a little up in the air. But I wonder if Lamarck will get a modicum of vindication from the biology textbooks in the long run. That being said, epigenetic inheritance does not falsify evolution by mutation.
- ufo 9y agoI tried to keep the comment short but yes, Lamarck does get too much off a bad rep nowadays. His theory wasn't on the mark but he played a big role in making evolution be an accepted theory in the first place.