5 ms·
"So what's the answer? Revolution?" Haha, no, not in this day and age. People in power these days know you have to keep the public sated to prevent revolution.
by naner 16y ago
"So what's the answer? Revolution?"
Haha, no, not in this day and age. People in power these days know you have to keep the public sated to prevent revolution. People with family and jobs who live in relative safety and have a reasonable amount of income aren't going to revolt. And the public shouldn't initiate a revolution anyways because the cost becomes too great with a society this size.
The answer is deceptively simple. Develop a theory of change (work backwards from your end goal to discover the steps that need to be taken) and devise a strategy that takes into account the dynamics of power. The problem is that this is very difficult. You have to be very disciplined, you have to abandon your personal life goals, you have to find people to help you, and you will almost certainly have to do something out of line with your ideals (such as manipulating people or temporarily acting like the people you are trying to be rid of).
- lwhi 16y agoWell, they say that every society is only three meals away from revolution. Maybe it's true. Even if not, I think there are certain cataclysmic events that could provoke a reaction (Greece recently showed that). I think developing a theory of change is useful, but then again - wouldn't it involve creating an instrument of power to control the masses? Rather than moderating the power networks we have, the public would be pushed from pillar to post. I think it would be more useful to society in general, if we were able to define limits to the amount of power a single entry has.
- lwhi 16y agoReminds me of the quote "Be careful when you fight the monsters, lest you become one."