3 ms·
The primary market works in part because there is a secondary market. It would be a lot harder to raise the initial capital if the initial investors wouldn't ha
by pg314 9y ago
The primary market works in part because there is a secondary market. It would be a lot harder to raise the initial capital if the initial investors wouldn't have the prospect of unloading their shares to the public. That doesn't mean I buy into the myth of the stock market as an efficient allocator of capital, though. For one, it isn't efficient. For another, if you look at e.g. AAPL a huge amount of capital is sunk into the stock, while the company doesn't know what to do with all the money it is generating.
Post-IPO, companies can also raise additional capital by issuing more shares (either to the public or by e.g. issuing RSUs to employees). Only in those cases is the stock price relevant. Otherwise, the market can be mispricing a stock without any bearing on the functioning of the company.
- neilwilson 9y ago'It would be a lot harder to raise the initial capital if the initial investors wouldn't have the prospect of unloading their shares to the public." It wouldn't, because there isn't anything else they can do with the capital other than sit on it in a bank and get no return. The myth that the stock market is relevant is put about by people who work in stock markets. Much like share buy-backs are the same as dividend payments. Exactly how giving the company's money to people who want to stop investing in the company is the same as giving it to those that do is a triumph of using dodgy maths and statistics to fool people.