3 ms·

> Can we agree that taking photographs of people without their consent is nothing more than extremely creepy? In public? I'd replace "nothing more than" with "

• chisleu 9y ago
  That certainly could have been better worded, but in context we aren't talking about photographers with nice cameras like were certainly used to take those pictures. We are talking about spy cameras or cellphones generally used in a surreptitious manor to conceal the fact that ladies are being filmed/photographed. IMO, if you don't want to be photographed while scantily clad in public, don't go into public scantily clad. People want the freedom of walking around in skin tight clothes that expose the curves of every piece of their anatomy to all that who can see without the consequences of exposing the same to all who can see. Apparently public shaming isn't enough and they need to call on the fringe "everything is violence" crowd to bring illegal actual physical violence into the mix. :( Note: I have no problem with anyone wearing anything they want. I totally support it. I just dislike this topic being treated as news here.