I think the objection is because there's still a wire between the wall and the pad, and your phone still has to be on the pad. That is, your phone still has to

I think the objection is because there's still a wire between the wall and the pad, and your phone still has to be on the pad. That is, your phone still has to be physically connected, through a wire, to an electrical outlet. Maybe "plugless" is a term that more accurately describes the benefit. IMO, it's a very nice benefit so I don't mean to minimize it. We suppose that eventually there will be some kind of charging where you don't even have to set your device on a pad -- I guess it will charge if you just get it into a charging area or room. Then we might want to call that wireless but the term will be taken. I don't think that's really an issue though. That's a marketing issue we can let the marketing people solve if/when we get there. I'd probably try to call it "True Wireless" or "Long Wireless" but that's probably a sign of why I'm not a marketing person.