4 ms·
Among other things, they could easily blackmail any public figure who used Google search (or mail, maps, etc.) There are various ways they could frame this to
by temphn 16y ago
Among other things, they could easily blackmail any public figure who used Google search (or mail, maps, etc.)
There are various ways they could frame this to retain their image...one would be to announce a campaign to crack down on the use of gmail for lawbreaking. Then sweep email for selective incidents involving politicians (and reporters!) threatening Google with regulation, and report to the authorities.
They already do this with child pron, so this would just be moving the bar back towards things that 99% (as opposed to 99.999...%) of society opposed. Escorts are probably a good place to start if you wanted to take down politicians.
- Ardit20 16y agoWell, maybe politicians should not do naughty things. If they are using gmail for lawbreaking then I am in favour of google outing them.
- JadeNB 16y agoThis seems to me like a variant of the ‘nothing to hide’ argument, which Bruce Schneier (http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/12/my_reaction_to.html http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/12/my_reaction_to...), Daniel Solove (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=998565 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=998565), and others have thoroughly rebutted. It's true that politicians should be subject to more scrutiny than the rest of us, but that doesn't mean that they should have no privacy. Do you trust Google to make that decision about politicians? Once politicians are afraid of the power that Google wields, do you trust them to protect you from Google?