4 ms·
> I understand that server-side rendering is basically dead. Server-side rendering is a mature technology, don't measure it's pervasiveness in how often you se
by dom0 9y ago
> I understand that server-side rendering is basically dead.
Server-side rendering is a mature technology, don't measure it's pervasiveness in how often you see articles in the news about it...
- jdmichal 9y agoHey, I love ASP.NET as much as the next guy. But there's no mistaking the large trend from what used to be entirely server-side rendering (LAMP days) to REST services with JavaScript front-ends.
- theSpaceOctopus 9y ago> But there’s no mistaking the large trend... You didn’t say that, you said “server side rendering is basically dead”. Believe it or not, lots of people are still building things without JavaScript front ends.
- jdmichal 9y agoSo is the only argument here that "basically dead" was a bit carelessly hyperbolic?
- chrisweekly 9y agoSSR is table stakes for any reasonably modern web application.
- jdmichal 9y agoNo true Scotsman... I would say more, but that's your entire comment so I don't have anywhere else to go.