3 ms·
DRM and webassembly. The end of openness in both cases—though at least WebAssembly means we eventually won't have to write Javascript anymore, which is nice as
by ashark 9y ago
DRM and webassembly. The end of openness in both cases—though at least WebAssembly means we eventually won't have to write Javascript anymore, which is nice as far as that goes.
Sure, Javascript uglifiers and frameworks mucking with HTML standards and the DOM had already made "view source" nigh-worthless, and there were DRM'd plugins of course, and browsers had supported some schemes for a while as a de facto standard, but this still feels like a last-straw kind of situation to me.
> My own company is developing an open source platform for communities to run their own social networks (https://qbix.com https://qbix.com) so what is this "eating" you speak of?
Sure, it's already the world's premiere delivery mechanism for "apps", advertisements, and mass surveillance software. I know. That's exactly the kind of thing that I don't mind living somewhere, but I'd like it not to be all mixed up in my networked hypertext document reader.
This Web's over. Anyone hosting an After-Web? I could do with a little more Webbing.
[EDIT] Though actually your thing seems fine. I saw "social network" and glossed over the rest. Sorry.
- sp4ke 9y agoBookmarking this page in hope of having some alternatives. I'm even ready to throw some money/programming hours to any serious projects