2 ms·
> If you want a text-only web, with no major content producers on it, you already have that. And that (the web as it is) is exactly what I want. And I want tha
by wolfgke 9y ago
> If you want a text-only web, with no major content producers on it, you already have that.
And that (the web as it is) is exactly what I want. And I want that the media companies who cannot accept that the web is free of DRM to stay away from it.
- KGIII 9y agoThat's not your decision to make. They own their sites and content. You are, of course, free to ignore it. If you don't like a site, use the back button. You can complain, of course. What you can't do is control others. That's something the web is good at working around.
- wolfgke 9y ago> That's not your decision to make. They own their sites and content. They try to spread DRM-malware over the EME interface onto the user's computers.
- KGIII 9y agoAnd you have the options to not use it. You don't get to decide what other people do with their property. That's pretty much against the reasons the web is here. You can complain, if you want. That doesn't appear to be helping but you're free to do so. My strategy is to avoid it where reasonably possible. I let other people do what they want with their stuff.
- rimliu 9y agoI will gladly take DRMed netflix over ad-ridden crap that "free" web gives us. It seams that people are using "walled garden", "free/not free", "user hostile" without giving any thought. It sure cannot be user hostile when there are no users, can it?