3 ms·
> Most is not a number. ...You said "98%". It's right there.
by PhasmaFelis 9y ago
> Most is not a number.
...You said "98%". It's right there.
- wruza 9y agoSomeone also said "free like in beer" but it wasn't beer. Your arguments to the point (not to misinterpreted words) are still welcome, though I'm pretty tired now that three different persons put a honk and lost in fog. Cool argumentation, dudes, hold it like that.
- adamlett 9y agoSo the answer is yes, you did make up the number. Thank you.
- wruza 9y agoI assume you have no viable internet connection to follow provided links, so citing may be useful: >Additionally, the CCTV has had only a 3-15% success rate in identifying suspects of crime, burglary, etc. Given the generous assumption of equating the cameras' ability to stop crime to stopping terrorism, there would still only be a 15% success rate at the most. Counter-terrorism methods must be 100% effective or people will be murdered. This seriously impacts the argument that CCTV surveillance (as it is being done currently) would be able to effectively stop terrorism. Hope these non-made up numbers clear some details on topic, my negative friend.