4 ms·
You're already pre-supposing SO much. You're pre-supposing a shared objective universe which we are both capable of observing, perceiving, explaining, and pred
by otakucode 9y ago
You're already pre-supposing SO much. You're pre-supposing a shared objective universe which we are both capable of observing, perceiving, explaining, and predicting. You are presuming a very specific order of causation and effect. All of these things are not 'given' in philosophy and can be manipulated to various effect (like hyperbolic geometries in mathematics). The argument that the universe exists apart from our perception or opinion of it is one position of many. (I happen to think that anyone who claims not to actually hold that opinion in the most deepest sense is a liar, but that's a different issue.) Philosophy is great for splitting hairs and breaking things down to their necessary essence - much like good programming does.
- yters 9y agoAre you presupposing any of those things in your response to me?
- otakucode 9y agoOf course! I have to presuppose that we share the same language, that the laws of physics won't shift and turn the atmosphere into spiders suddenly, that typing won't suddenly introduce poison into my bloodstream and thereby be a lethal mistake, all KINDS of things. Dealing with other people brings ethics and such into things, and that's the highest level of philosophy.