Here's a link to the video interview from CISO Susan Mauldin in 2016 that was erased from YouTube a few days ago, on September 10 after it was first reported:

Here's a link to the video interview from CISO Susan Mauldin in 2016 that was erased from YouTube a few days ago, on September 10 after it was first reported: http://evilrouters.net/media/susan_mauldin_cazena_interview_201603.m4v http://evilrouters.net/media/susan_mauldin_cazena_interview_... The HN thread that found another copy: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15262026 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15262026 The first story that I saw breaking this interview, drawing attention to this story before it was wiped out by "user": https://hollywoodlanews.com/equifax-chief-security-officer/ https://hollywoodlanews.com/equifax-chief-security-officer/ I'm reposting this information, there's nothing earth shattering for me in the interview but I smell a coverup (I hope it doesn't sound controversial when I say this, it appears to be that material information has been wiped off the public record during an investigation, and that's a coverup! Not mincing words.) This has hardly been covered at all, so I'm going to mention it again. I figure the story probably isn't going away anytime soon. I think it's criminal (possibly quite literally) that this information is being suppressed by whoever has taken the original interviews down. It should be a case study, we should all watch it. I want to hear more from Susan Mauldin, but the appearance is they want her to disappear. I am interested in the stock sales too, but I would like it to be a thing, where we all can learn from what has happened and fix our issues to be better at this kind of thing. There are obviously technical and greedological issues that own some blame, but let's not be hasty and sweep the cultural issues under the rug. (There was a second interview from that day, which to my knowledge has not been recovered yet.) I'd like to be charitable and say that CISO Susan Mauldin did nothing wrong, but it's hard for me to make that argument seriously without more data and I don't hear anyone calling for her to testify in front of Congress yet. Maybe they'd like us to forget she was ever involved in the company, that just makes me want to know more and it should you too, if you've been following the story (but who could blame you for not knowing, just look what they're doing!)