That goes against what throwaway284534 was implying. If everyone is a "peer" and an enormous number of those peers make a succinct, persuasive argument that EM

That goes against what throwaway284534 was implying. If everyone is a "peer" and an enormous number of those peers make a succinct, persuasive argument that EME is incompatible with W3C's mission statement of "Web for All" and "Web for Rich Interaction"[1], one would think that would make a difference in the direction the W3C takes. Instead I'm eating popcorn watching players with deep pockets choose tactics in their battle to control an industry. And that battle is what shapes this web API. So the claim of, "your peers are listening and they value your feedback," is about as convincing as a hold message from Comcast. [1] https://www.w3.org/Consortium/mission https://www.w3.org/Consortium/mission