3 ms·
I don't know if it's possible to copyright data (if I understand your definition of data correctly), but it should not be, at least, not in the US. A quick skim
by mjgoins 16y ago
I don't know if it's possible to copyright data (if I understand your definition of data correctly), but it should not be, at least, not in the US. A quick skim of the wikipedia article on US copyright law shows that the scope of copyright is meant only to cover the arts and literary and scientific writing.
Obviously we know that (unfortunately) that includes software, but data would be a stretch.
Also here:
http://sciencecommons.org/old/databases/#dbcopyright http://sciencecommons.org/old/databases/#dbcopyright
The important quote is:
"...whether the data itself is copyrightable, depends on what it is. To the extent it consists of factual information, it will not be copyrightable."
If it's not copyrighted, you don't need the GPL or anything similar.
- tzs 16y ago"Obviously we know that (unfortunately) that includes software, but data would be a stretch" How is it unfortunate that copyright covers software? Without copyright there would be no such thing as Free Software as it would be impossible to require people to distribute source with binaries or to distribute their changes. Closed source could survive somewhat in a world without copyright on software since it doesn't come with source in the first place and can at least attempt to use DRM or other technological means to stop people from redistributing.