4 ms·
What if you're required to be there physically for 8 hours, and you also don't get paid any more for better work then you currently produce? I suspect that woul
by consz 9y ago
What if you're required to be there physically for 8 hours, and you also don't get paid any more for better work then you currently produce? I suspect that would describe the majority of jobs.
- sigi45 9y agoIn my contract there are 8hours a day written down. You probably don't get paid for feature x, you get paid for 40 hours (or whatever). If you get paid to do feature x, you would be a contractor with an contract stating that you do feature x for payment y. I do make quality code because that is my standard. I do not care what others get paid for the same work. If they do, i will switch company and or will talk about my salary. If i work in a company with labor contract, than it was my choice and i still produce my quality and not reduce the quality on purpose to read HN for an our every day.
- consz 9y ago(I do get paid directly based on my work, so my original description for the 'majority of jobs' does not describe my own, so here I'm only speculating) I don't think anyone is reducing their work hours specifically to read HN for an hour every day. Like the study describes, most people don't and aren't capable of working for 8 hours an entire day; if they choose to spend the unproductive hours reading HN instead of working on some ancillary project, I don't see any reason they'd have to go out of their way to justify it to themselves.