>The advice in the article works well for simple things. Simple things can, and should, be perfect. That seems backwards, as the argument being put forwards is

>The advice in the article works well for simple things. Simple things can, and should, be perfect. That seems backwards, as the argument being put forwards is that UX is all about trading off a complex, options-rich interaction with a simple, options-poor interaction. So good UX delivers simple things. The hard work comes in the skilful reduction of a potentially complex interaction to a simpler one, and recognising that there are tradeoffs.