3 ms·
As I said, I have doubts. I'm not saying "definitely illegal," just dubious as all hell. In terms of specifics, maybe not anything criminal (though a prosecuto
by paultopia 9y ago
As I said, I have doubts. I'm not saying "definitely illegal," just dubious as all hell.
In terms of specifics, maybe not anything criminal (though a prosecutor could try the CFAA), but on the civil side tort law trespass theories, maybe also unjust enrichment theories, would be well worth a try for a plaintiff's lawyer.
But really, I'm thinking in terms of more abstract legal ideas that could use some caselaw development to flesh out---the notion that there's an implied license to use resources on a user's computer to an ordinary extent and for an ordinary purpose---and grabbing onto those resources for this kind of extraordinary purposes without prior notice violates that license in just the same kind of way that (eg) triggering a more conventional malware download would. If you buy that theory (and I tentatively do), then there are lots of concrete legal doctrines to hook it to.
- hobofan 9y agoOne point of reference: World of Warcraft and other games (apparently Windows 10 too) have used P2P (torrent-like) patch systems in the past, where after you downloaded a content update, you also distribute it to other users. AFAIK this was opt-out rather than opt-in. I think that falls under the same category of using the users' computer for an extraordinary purpose.
- icebraining 9y agoSkype and Spotify too.