There are a number of things that concern me about this and make me want to avoid using this product for the time being: Hardcoded keys by default - https://gi

There are a number of things that concern me about this and make me want to avoid using this product for the time being: Hardcoded keys by default - https://github.com/CloudBoost/cloudboost/blob/8ca349b53a7a9c609922d8be982928856f67fad4/server.js#L30 https://github.com/CloudBoost/cloudboost/blob/8ca349b53a7a9c..., committed to git Images being hotlinked off free icon sites - https://github.com/CloudBoost/cloudboost/blob/8ca349b53a7a9c609922d8be982928856f67fad4/server.js#L46 https://github.com/CloudBoost/cloudboost/blob/8ca349b53a7a9c... Outdated versions of frameworks, like https://github.com/CloudBoost/cloudboost/blob/0242a7433fe32794583ae227315e951d86ae581b/page-templates/user/login.ejs#L4 https://github.com/CloudBoost/cloudboost/blob/0242a7433fe327... Hardcoded CSS styles all over - https://github.com/CloudBoost/cloudboost/blob/0242a7433fe32794583ae227315e951d86ae581b/page-templates/user/login.ejs#L24 https://github.com/CloudBoost/cloudboost/blob/0242a7433fe327... It's also requesting Redis 3.0 on readme, when stable is 4.0 - a full major version behind, and the vast majority of commit messages are things like "fix [something]" or "cleanup" or "staging", I am normally not picky, and especially not if it's a personal project, but this appears to be a company with a commercialised product not meeting basic minimum standards - I don't see tests, I see public slack API tokens committed to the repo...