> I haven't expressed any particular ideology in any of my posts. The idea that women are oppressed by men is an ideology. Because it's based on ideas, and no

> I haven't expressed any particular ideology in any of my posts. The idea that women are oppressed by men is an ideology. Because it's based on ideas, and not on reality. If it was based on reality, it would be called "science". Or maybe "facts". Instead, it's based on "just so" stories that people tell each other. Like "the Jews are rich because they stole from the white people". It's a lie. All of these ideologies are the same. They use the same talking points. The same BS rhetoric about "oppressors" and "oppressed". The only things that change are the names of the oppressors (men / jews / the rich) and the names of the oppressed (women / white people / the poor). The ideologies are otherwise substantially similar. Since you're arguing over this. Let's talk details: * men in the US do not have the right to vote. Huh? How can I say this? That sounds crazy! Well... because they have historically not had the right to vote unless the registered for selective services. So men in the US did not have the unrestricted right to vote. The selective service act was fought in court, and men lost. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_Draft_Law_Cases https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_Draft_Law_Cases The court held that the draft was an obligation citizens had, in return for the right to vote. Women, of course, have had no restrictions on their right to vote. And who gave women the right to vote? The evil, patriarchal, oppressive, misogynistic... men. Yes, the men who "oppress" women gave them the right to vote. Without asking them to take on the social burdens that were demanded of men. So who's oppressed, really? The people who got conscripted, and died without having the vote? Or the people sitting at home, secure in the knowledge they'll never have to break a nail supporting their country?