The title of the piece is a bit click-baity, as the court opinion specifically states, as the article notes in its last paragraph, that “because [Gray] was not

The title of the piece is a bit click-baity, as the court opinion specifically states, as the article notes in its last paragraph, that “because [Gray] was not a minor sending sexually explicit images to another consenting minor, we decline to analyze such a situation.” The title is stated as a fact, wherein it is really the columnist's opinion: "I think that — given the logic of the majority opinion — the analysis would have to ... "