4 ms·
At least one company is "trying" keep my photos private. The other day Google Photo told my wife it had prepared an album for our trip to SFO. We were surprised
by maxpert 9y ago
At least one company is "trying" keep my photos private. The other day Google Photo told my wife it had prepared an album for our trip to SFO. We were surprised because she already disabled Geo-tagging but whataya know... Google still figured it out!
- petepete 9y agoIf you have location enabled on your phone, Google appears to cross reference your location with your photo timestamps to work out where you were. I know this because when I import my DSLR images to Google Photos it estimates the location, usually very accurately.
- ben1040 9y agoI've also seen it geotag things based upon the content of the image alone. I went to the photo store not long ago and had dozens of rolls of negatives scanned, from a vacation to Europe 20 years ago. I uploaded them into Google Photos and it geotagged many of them automatically. They have a public API that does the same, it detects landmarks in images and can give you a lat/long position for it as well as a confidence score. https://cloud.google.com/vision/docs/detecting-landmarks https://cloud.google.com/vision/docs/detecting-landmarks
- amonavis 9y agoI discovered the same last week. I made a trip to Amsterdam some 11 years ago, and since then uploaded my entire photo library to Google Photos. Last week I was playing around and searched "Amsterdam" in Google Photos, whaddaya know, (most of my) photos from Amsterdam showed up, at least those with discernible features/buildings/landmarks.
- pramodliv1 9y agoGoogle Photos uses ML to tag photos and this feature released amidst much fanfare at Google I/O a couple of years ago. They don't need location data to geotag photos anymore.
- nnutter 9y agoThanks for explaining one possible method. It could still mean Google is tracking location "without consent". I suppose it depends on whether they use that location data for anything other than Google Photos.
- eternalban 9y ago"Could"? Sounds like they 'did' with OP's SFO album.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- shpx 9y agohttps://www.technologyreview.com/s/600889/google-unveils-neural-network-with-superhuman-ability-to-determine-the-location-of-almost/ https://www.technologyreview.com/s/600889/google-unveils-neu... They took 126 million geotagged images from the web, bined them into 26,000 squares, and trained a neural net to predict which square on the earth an image was taken in. That's very poor resolution, but if you see that 20 images taken around the same time are tagged as the square that contains San Francisco, you can be pretty sure they all happened during a trip to San Francisco. Reminds me of https://geoguessr.com https://geoguessr.com
- raarts 9y agoDid you book a hotel/airbnb/flight and received a confirmation mail in your Google email account?
- maxpert 9y agoThat is true as well. I will buy something at Costco and I will see ads related to that. Book a hotel and see ads on Facebook (let alone Google). Problem is not the fact that I am looking for these things but the amount of information they steal without my consent.