3 ms·

I think you are wrong: * DEV is listed on the "delegated strings" page of ICANN[0] * `dig dev. ns +short` returns a couple of nameservers, the one of Charlest

by wut42 9y ago

I think you are wrong: * DEV is listed on the "delegated strings" page of ICANN[0] * `dig dev. ns +short` returns a couple of nameservers, the one of Charleston Road Registry: Google's registry. [0]: https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/delegated-strings https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/delegated-strin...

tscs37 9y ago
https://icannwiki.org/.dev https://icannwiki.org/.dev The ICANN Wiki specifically lists the .dev domain as proposed, not delegated. Which means they can also just kill it and Google won't have it.
- wereHamster 9y ago
  Who do you want to trust more, the DNS root servers or a wiki (which might be outdated, because "This page was last modified on 1 August 2014, at 10:04"). Is the wiki even ran by ICANN, given it's on a separate domain, or by a separate entity or volunteers?
  - ad133 9y ago
    I think you're right on this, for example .moi, which Amazon is taking registrations for (and has been for six months or so), is still listed on that wiki as proposed.
  - tscs37 9y ago
    Then I might be wrong, yes.
- dannyw 9y ago
  The ICANN wiki is unofficial.
- wut42 9y ago
  I don't think this is up-to-date: * On https://www.icann.org/resources/agreement/dev-2014-10-16-en https://www.icann.org/resources/agreement/dev-2014-10-16-en you can see the agreement between ICANN and Charleston Road Registry to operate the TLD for 10 years * other pages on the wiki for TLDs that you can already register now still shows "proposed"
  - tscs37 9y ago
    As I've pointed out in another comment, I've been wrong on this point.