4 ms·
> I find .test or .intranet to be more useful for such installations, Or, making a tradeoff from "accuracy" to "less magical" - ".chrome-hsts"
by lamby 9y ago
> I find .test or .intranet to be more useful for such installations,
Or, making a tradeoff from "accuracy" to "less magical" - ".chrome-hsts"
- tscs37 9y agoIf you really want to go down that rabbit holy: ".no-hsts" is still not taken, I believe so you can probably set it up as a private TLD in your hosts file.
- CydeWeys 9y agoUse one of the four TLDs from RFC 2606 that are guaranteed to never be delegated. Picking another random TLD that hasn't been delegated yet (but may be in the future) isn't a good idea.
- tscs37 9y agoTrue, but ".no-hsts" is unlikely to get HSTS enabled.
- CydeWeys 9y agoThat is far from the worst potential problem with using it, though. The biggest problem is if it does get delegated and you do not end up owning the actual "domain names" that you are using. You are now leaking web traffic to some unknown third party.