Did anyone actually read to the end before unloading the acerbic comments? This article is obviously targeted to the people involved in publishing who care onl

Did anyone actually read to the end before unloading the acerbic comments? This article is obviously targeted to the people involved in publishing who care only about the profit model part and not of the science part. I presume that's why it reads like a first year essay in some economic degree. As an occasional consumer of research papers I see nothing wrong of the conclusion in the end: "I suggest that we might be encouraged by the airline industry and unbundle the product. This would make all content free to read, answering the plea that the results of publicly funded research be available to the public,"